| 
         After Rajiv
        Gandhi’s assassination the politicians began to shun the refugees. 
        As most of these were women they were initially considered
        harmless but with the number of female suicide bombers swelling there
        was a marked change in GOI’s attitude to women refugees. 
        Soon the government turned a blind eye when touts came to recruit
        young women from the refugee camps in Tamil Nadu to work as “maids”
        in countries of Middle East.  Most
        of these women were then smuggled out of India and sent to the Gulf
        countries.  Often they were
        badly abused. By April 1993 refugee camps were reduced from 237 to 132
        in Tamil Nadu and 1 in Orissa. In Indian camps refugee families are
        given a dole of Rs.150 a month, which is often stopped arbitrarily. 
        Women are discouraged from taking up employment outside the
        camps.  During multiple
        displacements women who have never coped with such situations before are
        often at a loss for necessary papers. 
        When separated from male members of their family they are
        vulnerable to sexual abuse.  The
        camps are not conducive for the personal safety of women, as they enjoy
        no privacy.  But what is
        more worrying is that without any institutional support women become
        particularly vulnerable to human traffickers. These people aided by
        network of criminals force women into prostitution. 
        Millions of rupees change hands in this trade and more lives get
        wrecked every day. Asha Han’s paper in Refugees and the State portrays
        the predicaments faced by refugee women in South Asia. 
        Many displaced women who are unable to cross international border swell
        the ranks of the internally displaced. 
        Paula Banerjee’s paper in Internal Displacement in South Asia
        portrays the trauma faced by IDP women. Even in IDP camps women are
        responsible for holding together fragmented families. 
        Today roughly one-third of all households in Sri Lanka are headed
        by women and the numbers increase many fold in   | 
      
        
       | 
      
         the camps for internally displaced. 
        Although 89 percent women in Sri Lanka are literate, due to two
        decades of armed conflict women from North and East have lower levels of
        education with one in every four being illiterate.  
        A report based on a research carried out at Mannar district
        portray that among 190,000 IDPs women often find it impossible to
        generate enough income for buying food for the whole family. 
        In Illupakkadavai, all 36 heads of female headed households
        stated that they rely on dry rations for approximately 90 percent for
        their nutritional needs and that the children of women headed households
        are most vulnerable to exploitation. 
        In Sri Lanka suicide rates for women have doubled in the last two
        decades.[2] 
        None of the South Asian states are signatories to the 1951 Convention
        relating to the Status of Refugees or the 1967 Protocol. 
        As India is the largest South Asian state it should be
        interesting to see how women refugees are dealt with here. 
        In India Articles 14, 21 and 25 under Fundamental Rights
        guarantee the Right to Equality, Right to Life and Liberty and Freedom
        of Religion of citizens and aliens alike. 
        Like the other South Asian states India had ratified the 1979
        Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against
        Women in 1993.  Although
        there is no incorporation of international treaty obligations in the
        Municipal laws still rights accruing to the refugees in India under
        Articles 14, 21 and 25 can be enforced in the Supreme Court under
        Article 32 and in the High Court under Article 226. 
        The other guiding principles for refugees are the executive
        orders that have been passed under the Foreigners Act of 1946 and the
        Passport Act of 1967.  The
        National Human Rights Commission has also taken up questions regarding
        the protection of refugees.  It
        approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution and
        stopped 
        |